http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/recap?gameId=303240276
I know that AP articles are not the most reliable in the world all the time, but this article says that the referees determined that Cane's shot came after time expired. Is this what they ruled instead of that it was a charge? That changes things dramatically.
I know that AP articles are not the most reliable in the world all the time, but this article says that the referees determined that Cane's shot came after time expired. Is this what they ruled instead of that it was a charge? That changes things dramatically.
